Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer
MotherboardAcer BA50_BH
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '23 at 10:22
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 85.5
41% 65 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 121
15% 117 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Acer(1025 1019) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4268
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 5.9
4% 5.53 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 7
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 92 75 79 72 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 122
Write 128
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 87.5
66% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.5
182% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-101.A00LF Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.4
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback