Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z790M-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 130%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z790M-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '23 at 20:20
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$230
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 226
2-Core 456
133% 257 Pts
4-Core 911
8-Core 1,548
149% 1,230 Pts
64-Core 2,621
162% 2,621 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 130%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A750
Intel(8086 1021) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4514
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.1% Above average
Lighting 104
Reflection 152
Parallax 252
85% 169 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 10
Splatting 20
9% 10.1 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 113%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GD3JX016N 256GB
117GB free
Firmware: 41020C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1487 437 419 417 440 415 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 2,395
Write 1,934
Mixed 1,643
SusWrite 602
366% 1,644 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 102
360% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1,996
DQ Write 1,842
DQ Mixed 1,489
1,235% 1,776 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 329%
Great: 287%
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 830 793 621 1011 919 567 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 86.1
Mixed 1369
SusWrite 790
152% 668 MB/s
4K Read 79.1
4K Write 357
4K Mixed 123
466% 186 MB/s
DQ Read 1808
DQ Write 841
DQ Mixed 663
668% 1,104 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 267%
Great: 323%
Intenso SSD 128GB
89GB free
Firmware: V0303B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 84 84 82 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.5% Very poor
Read 276
Write 250
Mixed 103
SusWrite 84.2
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 1.8
8% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
924GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 84 84 82 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 189
Write 199
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 84
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.M4FE Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.M4FE 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
95% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 31.8
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 30.7
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 95%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z790M-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 221%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 242%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z790M-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $1,125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback