Today's hottest deals

Asrock B365M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B365M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '23 at 10:35
Run Duration363 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$200
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 1,008
91% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,055
65% 1,055 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 66
56% 68.9 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 65
54% 65.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 2TB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 430
Write 216
Mixed 267
67% 304 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 15.4
59% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 174
147% 221 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 133%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: M6CR060
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 437
Write 336
Mixed 339
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 12.6
58% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 94.6
DQ Mixed 28.1
47% 93.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
327GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 136
Write 130
Mixed 82.3
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9401
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 32.3
Write 38.5
Mixed 31.9
26% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
800GB free
Firmware: 0909
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 91
Write 82.5
Mixed 29.8
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
183% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 87%
SABRENT 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0204
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 347
Write 256
Mixed 272
219% 292 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 12
2,262% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 66.7
DQ Mixed 48.6
576% 78 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 106%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
820GB free
Firmware: 040B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76.3
Write 87.9
Mixed 76.5
60% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.5
186% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 93%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
765GB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.6
Write 35.4
Mixed 17.4
22% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
211% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
USB DISK 2.0 2GB
1GB free, PID 3400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 20.4
Write 10.5
Mixed 9.7
15% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
29% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
4TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35
Write 33
Mixed 31.3
42% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.1
165% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 98%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
7TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1641
Write 0.7
Mixed 36.8
380% 560 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
132% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 96%
Mobile Drive 500GB
0GB free, PID fc1a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.1
Write 36.1
Mixed 17.7
37% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 39%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
94GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 50.4
Write 35.8
Mixed 33.2
48% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
58% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 60%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
221GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 50.5
Write 35.9
Mixed 24.2
43% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
73% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.M8FB 859B BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.M8FB 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 26.5
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 25.2
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365M Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 137% - Outstanding Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback