Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics6.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8433
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '23 at 20:16
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19% Very poor
Memory 11.3
1-Core 62
2-Core 120
31% 64.5 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 107
19% 135 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 19%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 8433) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 11.1
6% 8.9 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 8
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
748GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 51 57 117 157 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 162
Write 176
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 107
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 112%
Maxtor OneTouch II 100GB
9GB free, PID 7110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 29 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 21.5
Write 27.2
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 28.9
35% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 392
10% 392 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx Builds (Compare 1,979 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback