Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A/M.2  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '17 at 10:12
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$45
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 181
77% 129 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 322
43% 319 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4815
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.58% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 9.92
Parallax 6.56
6% 7.77 fps
MRender 9.57
Gravity 5.93
Splatting 14.2
8% 9.91 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.58%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 496
Write 239
Mixed 249
72% 328 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 13.4
51% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 80.2
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 48.7
46% 71.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 65%
Hitachi HTS541010A9E680 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 166
Mixed 164
132% 176 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.24
89% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD44G213381 Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDD1 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.5% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21.6
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 23.3
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback