Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z690 AERO G DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AERO G DDR4  (all builds)
Memory39 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221207
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 01 '23 at 20:07
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600KF-$135
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 77.8
1-Core 195
2-Core 378
113% 217 Pts
4-Core 741
8-Core 1113
115% 927 Pts
64-Core 1,366
85% 1,366 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 108%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$470
EVGA(3842 4767) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.50
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 164
Parallax 164
133% 164 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 152
Splatting 135
115% 140 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 122%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$100
602GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1576 902 885 853 927 915 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,011
Write 2,226
Mixed 1,897
SusWrite 1,010
402% 1,786 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 84.3
288% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,436
DQ Write 1,193
DQ Mixed 1,258
958% 1,296 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 290%
Great: 347%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$115
232GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1552 839 837 842 841 843 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 1539
Write 1,903
Mixed 1,500
SusWrite 959
333% 1,475 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 81.9
281% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,506
DQ Write 1220
DQ Mixed 1,324
1,002% 1,350 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 268%
Great: 276%
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
39GB free
Firmware: 4M2QEXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,388
Write 1,504
Mixed 1,640
408% 1,844 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 91.2
317% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 997
DQ Write 1,285
DQ Mixed 1,149
865% 1,144 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 279%
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
278GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 425 421 410 424 418 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 462
Mixed 324
SusWrite 422
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 45.4
129% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 246
209% 307 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
WD Game Drive 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 2630
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 33
Write 34
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 21.2
39% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 63%
SSK Storage 2TB
2TB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 49.9
Write 34
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 21.3
45% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 10.4
644% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLM16G40C18U4B.M8FB1 BLE8G4D40BEEAK.M8FE1 BLM16G40C18U4B.M8FB1 BLE8G4D40BEEAK.M8FE1 48GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
129% Outstanding
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 49.5
MC Mixed 45
140% 48.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 47.6
SC Mixed 28.5
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z690 AERO G DDR4 Builds (Compare 1,142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AERO G DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,030
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback