Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire VN7-592G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire VN7-592G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire VN7-592G
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150925
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 12:47
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 167
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 488
48% 392 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1039) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.14% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 6.2
5% 9.87 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.8
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.14%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ02ABD100H 480GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA15.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 116 172 166 118 205 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.8% Above average
Read 205
Write 103
Mixed 302
SusWrite 180
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 25.3
92% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 182
163% 245 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.5% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 10.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire VN7-592G Builds (Compare 485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire VN7-592G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback