Today's hottest deals

GPU GWTC71427

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGPU GWTC71427  (all builds)
MotherboardGPU GPU Company
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220424
Uptime375.4 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 21:27
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 59.4
1-Core 163
2-Core 254
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 712
71% 576 Pts
64-Core 857
53% 857 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1C6C 078B) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 21.2
17% 22.4 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 1.7
13% 17.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
W800s 512GB 512GB
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 298 293 289 266 259 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 304
Write 236
Mixed 277
SusWrite 267
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 14.6
49% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 22.1
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 289
163% 153 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 19
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GWTC71427 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: GPU GWTC71427

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback