Today's hottest deals

Huanan Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemHuanan Default string  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '23 at 16:22
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 140
60% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 543
49% 410 Pts
64-Core 763
47% 763 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.6% Above average
Lighting 70.4
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 68.2
57% 70.7 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 65.2
55% 67.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 146 131 90 115 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 907
Write 147
Mixed 233
SusWrite 127
76% 353 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 32.8
122% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 188
142% 193 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 192%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
92GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 315 317 315 313 307 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 461
Mixed 398
SusWrite 330
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 41.7
138% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 350
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 124%
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
47GB free
Firmware: R211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 125 123 124 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 424
Write 142
Mixed 194
SusWrite 124
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 30.5
113% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 129
108% 159 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter 2x16GB
2 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.8% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Default string Builds (Compare 965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Huanan Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback