Today's hottest deals

Chuwi GemiBook Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemChuwi GemiBook Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault JS131
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2160 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221229
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '23 at 09:57
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 44
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 104
42% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 199
25% 192 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 4.8
3% 5.47 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
G521N256GB 256GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 38 213 139 39 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 343
Write 306
Mixed 263
SusWrite 116
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 6.9
38% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 12.9
64% 142 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E1G32D4NQ-046WTE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.5% Average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 13.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GemiBook Pro Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Chuwi GemiBook Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback