Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive362% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory44 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '23 at 17:59
Run Duration465 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$222
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 76.1
1-Core 213
2-Core 424
122% 238 Pts
4-Core 823
8-Core 1,411
135% 1,117 Pts
64-Core 2,407
149% 2,407 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$146
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 52.6
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 52.4
43% 54.1 fps
Gravity 49.3
Splatting 46
42% 47.7 fps
Poor: 39% Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30013 1TB
464GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3215 1500 1637 717 801 813 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2298
Write 4,490
Mixed 2,816
SusWrite 1,447
627% 2,763 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 108
349% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,719
DQ Write 1,570
DQ Mixed 1,705
1,262% 1,665 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 362%
Great: 508%
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: SU6SM003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4340 4479 2903 2111 1381 1359 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
422% Outstanding
Read 2,259
Write 4,315
Mixed 2,824
SusWrite 2,762
691% 3,040 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 81.8
258% 91.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,842
DQ Write 1,855
DQ Mixed 1945
1,435% 1,880 MB/s
Poor: 277%
This bench: 422%
Great: 604%
Fusion-io ioDrive2 785GB MLC
199GB free
Firmware: 7.1.17 rev 116786 Public
SusWrite @10s intervals: 835 862 863 865 860 851 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
1.5TB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 897 896 896 898 897 890 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
919GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 469 469 470 469 466 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 470
Mixed 448
SusWrite 469
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 32.4
107% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 201
148% 194 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 99%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
184GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2115 2115 2096 2036 2001 1934 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 2,594
Write 2,201
Mixed 1,528
SusWrite 2,049
469% 2,093 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 67.9
227% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,434
DQ Write 1,464
DQ Mixed 1,515
1,120% 1,471 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 364%
Great: 393%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$71
466GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2004 2005 2004 1991 1558 244 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 1,630
Write 2,040
Mixed 1,711
SusWrite 1,634
397% 1,754 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 64.5
223% 78.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,594
DQ Write 1,410
DQ Mixed 1,232
998% 1,412 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 300%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-32GVK 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 30.6
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 25.9
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 9,517 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 272%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4 - $376

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,411
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback