Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82A2
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '23 at 02:19
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500TE
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Memory 6.7
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 153
39% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 283
36% 276 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 82A2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.38% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 5.8
4% 4.87 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 8.2
5% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.38%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2.5 240GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42059100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 166 120 121 122 121 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.5% Average
Read 282
Write 261
Mixed 270
SusWrite 152
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 15
54% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 23.7
67% 147 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x4909] V03D4LF8GB5285282400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 6.3
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 4.5
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 436
9% 436 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G4 SFF Builds (Compare 758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback