Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210804
Uptime14.6 Days
Run DateApr 28 '23 at 08:14
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$440
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 782
76% 623 Pts
64-Core 1095
68% 1095 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$428
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (142 fps cap detected)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 142
Parallax 137
116% 140 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 142
Splatting 126
111% 136 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 111%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 388 379 421 411 407 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 164
Write 80
Mixed 315
SusWrite 399
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 33.4
122% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 164
128% 173 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 96%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
89GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,365
Write 1,558
Mixed 1,251
311% 1,391 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 58.4
205% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,040
DQ Write 806
DQ Mixed 899
679% 915 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMN64GX4M2Z3200C16 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 80
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 21
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 21.4
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback