Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-C621 AORUS XTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 298%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics244% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-C621 AORUS XTREME  (all builds)
Memory372.1 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '23 at 18:45
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3175X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 216
71% 130 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 856
76% 643 Pts
64-Core 4,314
267% 4,314 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$991
Gigabyte(1458 40C7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
244% Outstanding
Lighting 339
Reflection 354
Parallax 421
276% 371 fps
MRender 520
Gravity 336
Splatting 246
286% 367 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 244%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 437 450 452 453 451 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 440
Mixed 420
SusWrite 450
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 42.9
144% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 354
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
296GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 440 430 433 438 438 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 444
Mixed 428
SusWrite 439
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 44.5
147% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
492GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 456 453 455 456 455 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 441
Mixed 421
SusWrite 455
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 43.2
138% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Seagate ST14000VN0008-2JG101 14TB
13TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 241 240 242 241 241 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 2% Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965640-035.C00G 9965640-035.C00G 9965640-035.C00G 9965640-035.C00G 9965640-035.C00G 9965640-035.C00G Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3B1 Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3B1 Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3B1 Micron ... 383GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
144% Outstanding
MC Read 49.2
MC Write 78.2
MC Mixed 54
173% 60.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 7.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 144%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-C621 AORUS XTREME Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-C621 AORUS XTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback