Today's hottest deals

Asrock A520M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '23 at 16:43
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$139
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 85.6
1-Core 163
2-Core 324
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 872
97% 762 Pts
64-Core 1,068
66% 1,068 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 20.4
Parallax 28.9
18% 23.6 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 24
Splatting 21.6
17% 20.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1031 256GB SSD
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1115 1123 1143 1152 351 374 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,127
Write 1146
Mixed 1,034
SusWrite 876
236% 1,046 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 79.8
295% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 975
DQ Mixed 631
516% 719 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 223%
Great: 223%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CG3200D4M13508G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.8% Very good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 25.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 40.5
SC Mixed 28.4
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A520M-HVS Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback