Today's hottest deals

Huananzhi X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardHuananzhi X79  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime4 Days
Run DateApr 06 '23 at 13:40
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 149
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 426
42% 345 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 53.1
Parallax 36
29% 41.5 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 36.5
Splatting 31.8
28% 34 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
568GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 413 414 422 372 382 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 422
Mixed 387
SusWrite 402
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 34.2
114% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 287
225% 312 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Dimm0_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- Dimm2_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- Dimm6_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.1% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 27.6
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 11.2
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback