Today's hottest deals

Asus K30AM-J

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus K30AM-J  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AM-J
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140529
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 05 '23 at 03:26
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1800
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 27.1
12% 23.8 Pts
4-Core 28.4
8-Core 28
4% 28.2 Pts
64-Core 25
2% 25 Pts
Poor: 15% Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.43 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 116 115 116 111 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 98.9
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 109
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 103%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB
101GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 7.2 7.2 6.9 7.3 7.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 49.9
Write 25.6
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 7.4
30% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
41% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 47%
Maxtor 7 Y250M0 251GB
122GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 30 30 30 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.3% Very poor
Read 52.1
Write 30.7
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 29.6
43% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
61% 0.83 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.19% Terrible
MC Read 1.5
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 1.9
6% 2.23 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 1.3
4% 1.5 GB/s
Latency 681
6% 681 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 6.19%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30AM-J Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus K30AM-J

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback