Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3500PH_K3500PH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3500PH_K3500PH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X3500PH
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '23 at 15:17
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 69
1-Core 132
2-Core 257
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 610
64% 514 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 185C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3118
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Lighting 48.8
Reflection 51.3
Parallax 45.2
40% 48.4 fps
MRender 52.2
Gravity 44.4
Splatting 41.4
37% 46 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,229
Write 1014
Mixed 916
234% 1,053 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 62.3
219% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 451
DQ Write 383
DQ Mixed 378
294% 404 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 297%
Mass Storage Device 8GB
7GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.2
Write 6.5
Mixed 6
10% 9.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.6
115% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.7% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 19.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 14.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3500PH_K3500PH Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3500PH_K3500PH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback