Today's hottest deals

Asus P5K-VM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5K-VM  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 7 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080118
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 20:23
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7200-$14
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Memory 50.3
1-Core 27.8
2-Core 35.2
27% 37.8 Pts
4-Core 56.1
8-Core 51.9
7% 54 Pts
64-Core 56.5
4% 56.5 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
MSI(1462 809F) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.7% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 0.4
2% 1.6 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.8
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PAFEC2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 69 42 58 70 8.7 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.6% Poor
Read 123
Write 71.4
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 49.8
18% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 5.1
42% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 24.3
DQ Write 54.2
DQ Mixed 6.3
14% 28.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 85%
USB3.0 high_speed 500GB
240GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 55.5
Write 28.2
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 28.7
43% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
51% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K-VM Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $54
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback