Today's hottest deals

Asrock H110M-HDS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDS  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '17 at 21:28
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$45
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 114
2-Core 204
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 297
42% 308 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Zotac(19DA 3255) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 39.5
Parallax 52.2
35% 45 fps
MRender 54.6
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 36.3
37% 46.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 405
Mixed 414
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 22.9
128% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 120
137% 237 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Elements 2TB
369GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 69.2
Write 68.8
Mixed 66.1
88% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.22
64% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 44%
mSD Card 32GB
1GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 90.4
Write 39.6
Mixed 53.7
70% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.97
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 1.96
177% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.6% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 21.8
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 22.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HDS Builds (Compare 617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback