Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80XL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemLenovo 80XL  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200630
Uptime45.8 Days
Run DateMar 07 '23 at 18:11
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 78.3
2-Core 124
58% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 189
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 39C5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 5.5
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 0.3
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDDAK2T0TDL 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M1LN002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 293 375 269 251 266 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 356
Write 406
Mixed 348
SusWrite 281
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 32
103% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 253
194% 266 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 0710 TMKS4G56AHFHA-24U 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.3% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 16
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80XL Builds (Compare 1,908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80XL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback