Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago, 18 months ago, 16 months ago, 14 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '23 at 13:08
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Memory 76.3 1-Core 46.1 2-Core 87.7 46% 70 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 233 25% 198 Pts	64-Core 236 15% 236 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% EVGA(3842 3063) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.04 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 21.6 Reflection 30.9 Parallax 25.7 18% 26.1 fps	MRender 34.3 Gravity 29.8 Splatting 26.5 24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue SSHD 4TB (2015)-$65 1,900 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 88 63 65 92 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 103 Write 111 Mixed 56 SusWrite 78.7 64% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 83%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$116 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 171 165 171 165 168 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 160 Mixed 67.4 SusWrite 168 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 347% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 107 103 107 106 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 83.7 Write 110 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 101 66% 90.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.5 218% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 4x8GB 252 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 12.1 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.8 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	386x
FX-8320AMD $153Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	103x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	87x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	44x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	31x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	44x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $601

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350