PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z640 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212A |
Memory | 57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160218 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Feb 11 '23 at 09:39 |
Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
Run User | KEN-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
|
47.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 147A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
102%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 312 260 255 260 251 MB/s
|
60.4%
Good
|
|||
Toshiba THNSN81Q92CSE 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 8EET6102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 385 388 377 385 393 MB/s
|
68.8%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
119%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 113x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 107x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 99x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 155x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 119x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 64x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 16% - Very poor | Total price: $509 |