PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 522% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z390 D (all builds) |
Memory | 9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191015 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 05 '23 at 10:23 |
Run Duration | 255 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
73.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS100T2B0C 1TB
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 44 44 45 45 MB/s
|
522%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
103GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 106 107 107 109 108 MB/s
|
54.5%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD10EVDS-63N5B1 1TB
65GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 62 60 62 62 MB/s
|
42.2%
Average
|
|||
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$82
64GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 96 96 97 96 MB/s
|
53.8%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
95GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 83 77 76 78 78 MB/s
|
66.4%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
360GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 95 97 98 97 MB/s
|
47.8%
Average
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 18TB
11.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 141 139 143 143 MB/s
|
49.3%
Average
|
|||
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 2TB
15GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 44 44 44 44 MB/s
|
36.9%
Below average
|
|||
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
6GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 16 18 MB/s
|
7.3%
Terrible
|
|||
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
8GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 81 78 92 102 MB/s
|
49.4%
Average
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
14GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 15 15 MB/s
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
|||
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 2TB
15GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 44 44 45 44 MB/s
|
22.7%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C20 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
61.4%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $235Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 421x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $126Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 340x |
Core i5-9600KFIntel $170Bench 93%, 65,122 samples | 314x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 197x |
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 153x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $225Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 142x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 121% - Outstanding | Total price: $475 |