Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '15 at 22:09
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.80GHz
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 178
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 702
62% 529 Pts
64-Core 1,118
69% 1,118 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
MSI(1462 277C) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Lighting 48.9
Reflection 36.4
Parallax 64.4
40% 49.9 fps
MRender 34.1
Gravity 47.1
Splatting 45.1
35% 42.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
75% Very good
Read 381
Write 278
Mixed 301
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 31.9
117% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 76.5
78% 128 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 75%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 36.8
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 100%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION Builds (Compare 700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $534
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback