Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H67A-UD3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H67A-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101102
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 16 '17 at 10:18
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 193
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 473
52% 411 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 21
19% 20.8 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 17.4
18% 22.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 492
Write 177
Mixed 246
67% 305 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 17.8
66% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 46.3
67% 128 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 91%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
5GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 23.8
Write 16
Mixed 13.7
21% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.44
66% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H67A-UD3H Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H67A-UD3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback