Today's hottest deals

Supermicro SYS-F618R2-RTN+O-HP013

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemSupermicro SYS-F618R2-RTN+O-HP013  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DRFR-N
Memory250.4 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160127
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 01:46
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
CPU1, 2 CPU, 36 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 48.8
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 174
56% 104 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 661
59% 500 Pts
64-Core 2,712
168% 2,712 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 56%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 157 96 97 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 414
Write 373
Mixed 306
SusWrite 144
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 28
108% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 207
181% 268 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 31.5
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback