Today's hottest deals

Intel S5520HC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive14.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel S5520HC  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 10 '23 at 19:57
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Memory 28.3
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 98.9
34% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 382
35% 291 Pts
64-Core 943
58% 943 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 71 72 73 65 70 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.4% Very poor
Read 96.2
Write 74.2
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 69.6
18% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 6
20% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
189GB free
Firmware: 2BA30010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 37 36 37 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 64
Write 44
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 35.5
33% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 59%
Adaptec Array 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 88 92 92 82 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 49.6
SusWrite 86.5
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 9 slots used
32GB DIMM
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.9% Terrible
MC Read 4
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 2.7
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 2.1
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 265
15% 265 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 9.9%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S5520HC Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel S5520HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback