Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory41.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '23 at 00:59
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 V4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 180
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 670
60% 507 Pts
64-Core 1,994
123% 1,994 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
Nvidia(10DE 129F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 527.27
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 122% Great: 137%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 400GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 391 364 397 428 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 965
Write 398
Mixed 182
SusWrite 405
107% 488 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 21.7
82% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 201
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 104%
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 2TB
683GB free
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1830 1858 1858 1489 1187 1185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,775
Write 1,975
Mixed 1,836
SusWrite 1,568
404% 1,788 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 46.2
143% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 269
201% 269 MB/s
Poor: 277%
This bench: 224%
Great: 604%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1K43DB2-CWE 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB RIMM DDR4 2000 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.7% Very good
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 28
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $683
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback