Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 26 '22 at 22:23
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 119
2-Core 232
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 563
65% 504 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.6% Very good
Lighting 94.9
Reflection 94.7
Parallax 86.6
77% 92.1 fps
MRender 96.3
Gravity 87
Splatting 74.8
69% 86 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SK hynix BC501 H 256GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 73 72 74 76 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 611
Write 92.7
Mixed 195
SusWrite 76.1
53% 244 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 26.4
112% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 70.5
DQ Mixed 171
153% 244 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 158%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
572GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 48 49 47 49 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48% Average
Read 118
Write 46.6
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 48.8
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 48%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 152 150 152 151 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 152
Write 109
Mixed 105
SusWrite 147
95% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback