Today's hottest deals

Asus G73Sw

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive22.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G73Sw  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Sw
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110210
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 11 '17 at 18:19
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 134
59% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 311
32% 259 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Asus(1043 2048) 1GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.77% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 9.58
Parallax 6.69
6% 8.05 fps
MRender 9.76
Gravity 8.43
Splatting 9.04
7% 9.08 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.77%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-soli D3 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 188
Write 81
Mixed 114
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 7.82
4K Mixed 7.95
32% 9.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 55%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
103GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 96.9
Write 72.8
Mixed 71.9
60% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.43
4K Mixed 0.26
55% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G73Sw Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Sw

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback