Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Default string

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Default string (all builds)
Motherboard	Colorful C.H110M-T PLUS
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170612
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '22 at 21:02
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 73.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 207 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 296 37% 283 Pts	64-Core 297 18% 297 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(7377 0000) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 5.3 3% 4.23 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 7 Splatting 6.6 5% 5.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ZD256 256GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: HCS1A25E SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 104 82 97 18 85 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.5% Below average	Read 203 Write 179 Mixed 178 SusWrite 89.9 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 5.7 49% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 14.8 59% 126 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 80%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$25 32,229 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 152GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 66 64 64 64 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 69.2 Write 59.4 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 64.4 42% 57.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 50%
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB-$99 3,154 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 124GB free Firmware: FB2OC43C SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 16 17 18 18 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 35%
Hitachi HTS725016A9A364 160GB 1,217 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 149GB free Firmware: PCBOC72E SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 16 17 18 19 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM3200HLB-16G 1x16GB 198 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.6 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 94.5 42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Default string

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	1,052x
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples	997x
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples	950x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	509x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	509x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $225Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	490x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	344x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	185x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	156x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,408x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	504x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	371x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $84

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350