Today's hottest deals

Asus P7H55-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M LE  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '22 at 17:20
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 540-$60
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 65.8
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 104
48% 77.6 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 145
18% 140 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 40.2
Parallax 38.2
34% 40.1 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 41.7
Splatting 27.3
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$24
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 196 128 120 128 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.2% Poor
Read 223
Write 212
Mixed 202
SusWrite 127
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 9.23 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$42
311GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 70 67 65 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 54.5
Write 48.7
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 66.8
38% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 70%
USB 3.1 1TB
226GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 6.1 6 6 6.1 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
4.61% Terrible
Read 9.8
Write 12.2
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 6.2
7% 9.85 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.61%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.5% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 10.5
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-M LE Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback