Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S5300FN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S5300FN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X530FN
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '22 at 13:51
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 55.4
2-Core 97.1
48% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 203
20% 166 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1C0E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 4.4
3% 7.8 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$31
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1102A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,338
Write 490
Mixed 146
142% 658 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 9
73% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 180
130% 180 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 179%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
597GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 91 89 92 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 75
Write 101
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 89.6
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
182% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM2400HSB-8G 04CB AO1P24HC4R1-BUYS 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 11.2
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S5300FN Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S5300FN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $67
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $152Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback