Today's hottest deals

PEAQ PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPEAQ PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408  (all builds)
MotherboardPEAQ H110H4-EM2
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '22 at 14:02
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 281
41% 300 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Sapphire(174B 6438) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.35
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.8% Average
Lighting 60.9
Reflection 92.2
Parallax 57.5
50% 70.2 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 61.9
Splatting 57.8
50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 170 13 53 49 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 421
Write 376
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 88.9
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 16.7
57% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 19
DQ Mixed 1.4
31% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown-005.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.5% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.9
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.5
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: PEAQ PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback