Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 21:02
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 54%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 205
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 647
61% 504 Pts
64-Core 822
51% 822 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$120
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 95.9
58% 75.5 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 80
Splatting 49.5
52% 65.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56%
Great: 56%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 42.9
Parallax 43.9
31% 41.7 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 26.6
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS500G2B0A- 500GB
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 168 178 205 244 286 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 35
Write 52.5
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 215
66% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 9.4
1,307% 6.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 173%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$80
621GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 59 98 81 29 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 11.2
Write 32
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 66.1
24% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST14000NE0008-2JK101 14TB
11TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 138 87 83 102 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 161
Write 179
Mixed 98.9
SusWrite 127
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.8
549% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSE.16FD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 25.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 16.8
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 24,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback