Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 705 G5 Desktop Mini

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G5 Desktop Mini  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8619
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 14:00
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE w/ Radeon Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 187
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 524
53% 429 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
HP(103C 8619) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.10.20.05
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.79% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 22.2
6% 14.1 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 14.4
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.79%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AE00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 781 808 211 163 164 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1447
Write 1,376
Mixed 1259
SusWrite 382
250% 1,116 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 55.2
181% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 802
DQ Write 425
DQ Mixed 572
436% 600 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 165%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G5 Desktop Mini Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G5 Desktop Mini

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback