PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140604 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Nov 06 '17 at 03:46 |
Run Duration | 347 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 240
XFX(1682 7240) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4
|
5.6%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
90.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate BUP SL 4TB
3.5TB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
43%
Average
|
|||
Seagate FreeAgent 500GB
299GB free, PID 3001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
|||
USB DISK 2.0 2GB
2GB free, PID 3400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
4.98%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 49x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 27x |
FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 5x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $588 |