Today's hottest deals

AZW SER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 17:07
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 95.2
43% 70.5 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 671
58% 494 Pts
64-Core 650
40% 650 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.10.2
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.68% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 10.8
5% 8.13 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 10
Splatting 11
7% 7.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.68%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,878
Write 1,596
Mixed 1,313
355% 1,596 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 40.6
148% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,255
DQ Write 815
DQ Mixed 985
748% 1,018 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
SMI USB DISK 16GB
10GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 82
Write 10.9
Mixed 14
31% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.9
119% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS632A.M4FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 17.2
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SER Builds (Compare 814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback