Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81N7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81N7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190305
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateNov 19 '22 at 05:50
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 5405U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Memory 46.2
1-Core 50.5
2-Core 92
37% 62.9 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 116
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Legend(17AA 3F16) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9313
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 3.2
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 3
Splatting 0.3
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 135 112 116 121 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 348
Write 331
Mixed 223
SusWrite 146
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 14.2
42% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 246
175% 221 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 99%
Toshiba MK5065GSX 500GB-$52
28GB free
Firmware: GJ002H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 47 46 47 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 40.1
Write 48.4
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 46.7
28% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 10.2
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81N7 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81N7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback