Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80FF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemLenovo 80FF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G70-80
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160108
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateNov 18 '22 at 12:55
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 43.6
1-Core 47.8
2-Core 63.7
33% 51.7 Pts
4-Core 63.4
8-Core 68.4
9% 65.9 Pts
64-Core 64.5
4% 64.5 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3987) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 3.1
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZYLF128HCHP-000L2 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT63L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 31 31 33 36 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.9% Poor
Read 238
Write 50.6
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 33.7
21% 97 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 11.8
45% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 27.1
33% 61.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 2.7
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80FF Builds (Compare 224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80FF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback