Today's hottest deals

HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory123.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '22 at 13:20
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 78
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 158
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 599
57% 472 Pts
64-Core 1,698
105% 1,698 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro V4900-$150
HP(103C 2B06) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 7
6% 7.97 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 7.9
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$150
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 177 184 191 182 204 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 408
Write 192
Mixed 132
SusWrite 183
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 25.9
91% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 132
118% 179 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70QH0-CMA 128GB
1778, 1778, 1778, 1778, 1778, 1778, 1778, 1778 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 17.7
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.2
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback