Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-CS/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H110M-CS/BR  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160923
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateOct 27 '22 at 20:45
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$87
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 66.2
38% 57.6 Pts
4-Core 88.8
8-Core 86.6
12% 87.7 Pts
64-Core 61.3
4% 61.3 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 26.6
15% 19.5 fps
MRender 21.5
Gravity 20
Splatting 21.1
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 71 71 73 76 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 71.1
Write 95.8
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 68.8
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2133C14D4/4G 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
34.7% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 11.1
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-CS/BR Builds (Compare 676 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $212
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback