Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive9.41% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Stonic_CMS
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '22 at 16:16
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 185
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 470
49% 392 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 143D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.53% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 7.6
5% 24.7 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.53%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 52 26 31 29 28 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.41% Terrible
Read 124
Write 90.5
Mixed 122
SusWrite 42.9
21% 95 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.7
6% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 9.41%
Great: 229%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
219GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 72 81 78 91 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 37
Write 48.5
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 75.3
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.3
85% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN Kingston 9905700-118.A00G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 22.2
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-55 Builds (Compare 16,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback