Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 3010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 3010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3010  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '22 at 03:19
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470S
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 108
52% 84 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 250
28% 220 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$201
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.5% Good
Lighting 85
Reflection 86.7
Parallax 80.1
69% 83.9 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 76.8
Splatting 70.4
67% 83.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$99
764GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 191 206 214 223 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.6% Good
Read 228
Write 222
Mixed 206
SusWrite 204
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 35
116% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 195
147% 197 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 137%
Seagate ST4000VN006-3CW104 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 157 159 166 169 179 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 14.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 3010 Builds (Compare 4,438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback