Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu ESPRIMO P920

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P920  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3222-A1
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '22 at 15:40
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 180
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 318
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.99% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 6.1
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.99%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mibrand Spider 120GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 335 344 375 340 204 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.9% Very good
Read 468
Write 341
Mixed 348
SusWrite 321
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 13.7
102% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 18.3
63% 131 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
464GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 124 127 126 127 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 123
Write 120
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 127
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston K1N7HK-ELC 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P920 Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P920

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback