Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory50.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateOct 04 '22 at 06:24
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 291
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1,132
101% 855 Pts
64-Core 2,932
182% 2,932 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$751
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 497.29
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 49%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,847
Write 1,969
Mixed 1,338
452% 2,052 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 86.1
315% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,408
DQ Write 1,141
DQ Mixed 1,216
926% 1,255 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
140GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 443 448 449 450 450 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 449
Mixed 443
SusWrite 445
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 55.3
184% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 114%
Great: 132%
Toshiba HDWT380 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 93 98 84 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 132
Write 102
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 94.4
70% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 131%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 126 126 120 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 142
Write 143
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 124
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3600 C17 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 43.2
127% 44.4 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 38.1
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 118%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $478

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,522
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback