Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X10SAE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X10SAE  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SAE
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140509
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 28 '22 at 13:12
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 184
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 460
49% 392 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P4600
Device(15D9 0805) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.3
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA722050CLA330 500GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 55 70 123 122 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 111
Write 128
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 97.1
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965557-018.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.2% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 10.6
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10SAE Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Supermicro X10SAE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback