Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime13.3 Days
Run DateSep 27 '22 at 19:33
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B97
AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 47.4
2-Core 92.2
46% 71.1 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 119
15% 115 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E263) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 9
5% 8.13 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 6.3
6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 84 73 93 48 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 395
Write 340
Mixed 320
SusWrite 117
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 1.1
46% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 31.8
DQ Write 5.7
DQ Mixed 0.5
5% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
745GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 161 166 165 168 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 166
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 165
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 95%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 12.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.1
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback