Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-K9
Memory60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '22 at 03:41
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 651
59% 496 Pts
64-Core 1754
109% 1754 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$225
Asus(1043 8787) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74% Very good
Lighting 92.6
Reflection 91.3
Parallax 85.1
76% 89.7 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 81.4
Splatting 72.5
71% 89.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kodak X300 240G 240GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEB2.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 175 179 175 177 177 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 340
Write 208
Mixed 218
SusWrite 190
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 21.7
88% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 57.7
DQ Write 61
DQ Mixed 154
90% 91 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 91%
WD WD40EFZX-68AWUN0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00B81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 191 195 197 196 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 141
Mixed 104
SusWrite 195
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
419% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 111%
Great: 116%
Seagate Portable 1TB
529GB free, PID 2332
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 76 81 80 82 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 64.1
Write 72.8
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 80.4
83% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 59.8
MC Write 52.7
MC Mixed 47.9
153% 53.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 132%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback